Family-account trades
Do trades in a spouse's or dependent's name do better than the member's own?
What would look suspicious
Routing informed trades through family accounts.
Statistic
Family-account signed CAR and its difference from self-account trades
Inference
Kolari-Pynnonen test on family trades; date-clustered bootstrap of the difference
Decision rule
Fits if family-account returns are significantly positive and above self-account returns. Does not fit if family-account returns are bounded below the margin. Otherwise open question.
Equivalence margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days (fixed before seeing the data)
Inputs
Limitations
Many spouses are professionals who trade on their own account.
Full derivation and algorithm: technical methodology (PDF), section T14.
Results across members
0 fits · 15 open question · 2 do not fit · 229 not assessed (including 40 inconclusive for too few trades). 1 open question is a screening signal (unadjusted p below 0.05).
Highest estimates
Members flagged by this test
| Member | Reading | Estimate | Holm p | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angus S. King, Jr. Sen. · I-ME | Screening signal | +3.36% | 0.216 | 100% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +3.36% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| William R. Timmons IV Rep. · R-SC-4 | Open question | +2.72% | 0.494 | 95% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +2.72% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Scott Franklin Rep. · R-FL-18 | Open question | +1.70% | 0.763 | 26% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +1.70% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Sheri Biggs Rep. · R-SC-3 | Open question | +2.96% | 1.000 | 100% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +2.96% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Ed Case Rep. · D-HI-1 | Open question | +0.55% | 1.000 | 58% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +0.55% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Ashley Hinson Rep. · R-IA-2 | Open question | +2.60% | 1.000 | 100% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +2.60% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Robert E. Latta Rep. · R-OH-5 | Open question | +2.09% | 1.000 | 100% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +2.09% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Laurel M. Lee Rep. · R-FL-15 | Open question | +8.17% | 1.000 | 100% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +8.17% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Michael T. McCaul Rep. · R-TX-10 | Open question | +0.54% | 1.000 | 75% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +0.54% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Mitch McConnell Sen. · R-KY | Open question | +1.29% | 1.000 | 100% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +1.29% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Morgan McGarvey Rep. · D-KY-3 | Open question | +0.50% | 1.000 | 88% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +0.50% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Carol D. Miller Rep. · R-WV-1 | Open question | +1.51% | 1.000 | 57% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +1.51% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Dan Newhouse Rep. · R-WA-4 | Open question | +0.75% | 1.000 | 71% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +0.75% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Maria Elvira Salazar Rep. · R-FL-27 | Open question | +2.54% | 1.000 | 13% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +2.54% in the trade's favour over a month. |
| Debbie Wasserman Schultz Rep. · D-FL-25 | Open question | +3.72% | 1.000 | 90% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +3.72% in the trade's favour over a month. |