An independent review of public financial disclosures. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate, or any government agency.
U.S. House of Representatives

Rep. William R. Timmons IV

Republican · Representative, SC-4

Financial ServicesOversight and Government Reform
Results across 16 tests
Fits patternOpen questionDoes not fitNot assessedScreening signal

No test fits; open questions on breadth and concentration, event timing (abnormal returns), disclosure timeliness and more.

Trades disclosed
19
May 28, 2020 to Jun 15, 2026
Companies traded
15
Disclosed value
$68K–$370K
Sum of reported ranges
Filed after 45 days
1
Median filing lag 39 days

Scorecard

Select a test to see the estimate, interval, adjusted p-values and robustness checks.

T2Breadth and concentration15 different companies; the effective number of equally sized positions is 4 and trading spans 51% of maximum sector diversity.Open question

Question
Is trading concentrated in a few companies rather than spread across a diversified portfolio?

Insider signature
Informed trading concentrates in the few issuers tied to the information.

Analyst note
Dollar HHI 0.273 (identified set [0.081, 0.720]); trade-count HHI 0.075 vs. 95th percentile 0.064 of 19 random draws from all congressional trades (p = 0.004). Normalized sector entropy 0.51 [0.00, 0.69]. Top three issuers (SPCX, CRM, AMZN) carry at least 20% of dollar volume.

Evidence
Statistical
Effective number of issuers
4 [1, 12] 90%
0Estimate
This member4
All computed statistics (13)
n19
issuers15
hhi_mid0.2732
hhi_bounds[0.0805, 0.7198]
n_eff3.6600
hhi_count0.0748
peer_benchmark_p950.0637
peer_benchmark_p0.0040
sector_entropy0.5050
sector_entropy_ci[0, 0.6922]
top3_share_lower0.2046
top3[SPCX, CRM, AMZN]
top3_tied_to_eventsfalse
T4Event timing (abnormal returns)Across 17 priced trades, purchases and sales moved 2.72% in the trade's direction relative to the market over the next month on average.Open question

Question
Do purchases rise and sales fall more than the market in the weeks after the trade?

Insider signature
Purchases before price rises and sales before price falls.

Analyst note
Mean signed CAR(1,21) = 0.0272; 90% KP interval [-0.0026, 0.0571]; t_BMP = 1.71, r-bar = 0.022, t_KP = 1.46, Patell Z = 1.45, Corrado Z = 2.12. Dollar-weighted identified set [-0.0412, 0.0770].

Evidence
Statistical
Mean signed 21-day CAR
+2.72% [−0.26%, +5.71%] 90%
p-value
0.082
Holm-adjusted p
0.494
BH q-value
0.983
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
Robust to variants
No, reading changes under some variants
0δEstimate
This member+2.72%
All computed statistics (16)
n17
theta0.0272
ci[-0.0026, 0.0571]
p0.0824
t_kp1.4560
rbar0.0217
se_cs0.0146
se_kp0.0171
t_cs1.8671
t_bmp1.7081
patell_z1.4500
corrado_z2.1158
dollar_weighted_bounds[-0.0412, 0.0770]
calendar_time–
calendar_alpha_ci[–, –]
by_horizon[object Object]
Robustness variantReadingEstimate
Horizon 5 daysOpen question−0.12%
Horizon 63 daysOpen question+6.28%
Excluding largest batch dateNot assessed+1.10%
Self-owned accounts onlyNot assessed–
Dollar-weighted (bounds)Open question+7.70%
T7Disclosure timeliness5 of 18 trades (27.8%) were disclosed late; median lag 39 days.Open question

Question
Were trades disclosed within the STOCK Act's 45-day limit?

Insider signature
Delayed disclosure can conceal well-timed trades.

Analyst note
Late share 0.278, Wilson [0.142, 0.471]; 90th percentile lag 71 days; longest 71 days.

Evidence
Descriptive
Late share
27.8% [14.2%, 47.1%] 90%
0Estimate
This member27.8%
All computed statistics (15)
n18
amendment_rows_excluded1
late5
late_from_trade5
excused_by_notification0
late_share0.2778
late_ci[0.1423, 0.4713]
median_lag39
p90_lag71
max_lag71
filings1
late_filings1
late_priced5
timely_priced12
late_priced_dates1
T14Family-account trades95% of trades were in family accounts; those moved +2.72% in the trade's favour over a month.Open question

Question
Do trades in a spouse's or dependent's name do better than the member's own?

Insider signature
Routing informed trades through family accounts.

Analyst note
Family signed CAR 0.0272 [-0.0026, 0.0571], t_KP = 1.46.

Evidence
Statistical
Family-account signed CAR
+2.72% [−0.26%, +5.71%] 90%
p-value
0.082
Holm-adjusted p
0.494
BH q-value
0.908
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
0δEstimate
This member+2.72%
All computed statistics (8)
family_trades18
family_share0.9474
owner_unknown0
family_car0.0272
family_ci[-0.0026, 0.0571]
diff–
diff_ci[–, –]
diff_p–
T1Trade size95% of 19 trades were in the lowest disclosure band ($1,001-$15,000); trades just before large company-specific moves were not larger than usual.Does not fit

Question
Are the member's trades unusually large, especially just before news?

Insider signature
Informed trades are large relative to the trader's normal activity, because the profit from an informational edge scales with position size.

Analyst note
Lowest-band share 0.947, 90% Wilson [0.795, 0.988]. Event-linked size gap Delta_z = 0.00 (within-issuer permutation p = 1.000); 0 event-linked trades with z > 3 in bands of $50,001 or more.

Evidence
Statistical
Lowest-band share
94.7% [79.5%, 98.8%] 90%
p-value
1.000
Holm-adjusted p
1.000
BH q-value
1.000
0Estimate
This member94.7%
All computed statistics (9)
n19
lowest_band_share0.9474
lowest_band_ci[0.7950, 0.9882]
share_over_50k0.0526
max_z0
size_gap0
size_gap_p1
event_linked1
event_linked_outliers0
T3Cadence and event proximity67% of trading days were batches of three or more companies; 0% of trades look routine; 5.3% of trades came within five trading days before a large company-specific move (chance alone: 6.2%).Does not fit

Question
Do trades arrive in routine rebalancing batches, or sporadically just before company news?

Insider signature
Opportunistic trades carry information and routine trades do not.

Analyst note
Batch-day share 2/3, Wilson [0.25, 0.92]; index of dispersion 10.26 (chi-square p = 0); routine share 0.00 (portfolio-routine or Cohen-Malloy-Pomorski two-year rule). Proximity share 0.053 vs. circular-shift null mean 0.062, p = 0.650.

Evidence
Statistical
Batch-day share
66.7% [25.4%, 92.2%] 90%
p-value
0.650
Holm-adjusted p
1.000
BH q-value
0.999
0Estimate
This member66.7%
All computed statistics (14)
n19
trade_days3
batch_share_trades0.9474
batch_day_share0.6667
batch_day_ci[0.2535, 0.9217]
dispersion_index10.2576
dispersion_p0
routine_share0
proximity_share0.0526
proximity_null_mean0.0619
proximity_null_p950.2105
proximity_p0.6500
proximity_nonroutine0.0526
proximity_routine0
T8Committee overlap6% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 23% for a comparable benchmark.Does not fit

Question
Does the member trade industries their committees oversee, and do those trades do better?

Insider signature
Members may trade on information about industries their committees oversee.

Analyst note
Committees HSBA, HSGO; jurisdiction sectors Financials, Real Estate. Dollar share 0.057 (identified set [0.006, 0.316], bootstrap 0.000-0.182); benchmarks S&P 500 0.212, congressional peers 0.232.

Evidence
Descriptive
Jurisdiction excess share
-17.5% [-23.2%, -5.0%] 90%
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
0δEstimate
This member-17.5%
All computed statistics (11)
n18
in_jurisdiction_trades2
share0.0567
share_bounds[0.0061, 0.3157]
share_ci[0, 0.1816]
benchmark_sp5000.2119
benchmark_peers0.2316
excess-0.1748
excess_ci[-0.2316, -0.0500]
committees[HSBA, HSGO]
jurisdiction_sectors[Financials, Real Estate]
T11Performance relative to CongressAfter adjusting for noise, the member's trades rank at the 94% percentile of 134 members (shrunk estimate -0.28% per trade over a month).Does not fit

Question
After accounting for noise, does the member's trading beat that of other members?

Insider signature
A member with an information edge stands out from the cross-section of congressional traders.

Analyst note
Empirical Bayes: raw 0.0272, posterior -0.0028 (sd 0.0015); Congress mean -0.0028, between-member variance 0.000000.

Evidence
Statistical
Shrunk signed 21-day CAR
−0.28% [−0.53%, −0.03%] 90%
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
0δEstimate
This member−0.28%
All computed statistics (8)
raw0.0272
posterior_mean-0.0028
posterior_sd0.0015
congress_mean-0.0028
tau20
percentile0.9403
members_compared134
lower95-0.0058
T13Co-trading with other members16% of trades had another member trading the same stock the same way within a week (chance alone: 29%).Does not fit

Question
Does the member trade the same stock in the same direction as other members at the same time more than chance predicts?

Insider signature
Shared nonpublic information spreads through networks and shows up as clustered trades.

Analyst note
Co-traded share 0.158; circular-shift null mean 0.295, 95th pct 0.526, p = 0.910.

Evidence
Statistical
Co-traded share
15.8%
Robust to variants
Yes
All computed statistics (7)
n19
cotraded_share0.1579
null_mean0.2945
null_p950.5263
excess_p0.9100
cotraded_share_wo_top0.1579
excess_p_wo_top0.8600
Robustness variantReadingEstimate
Without M001157, the member with the most trades, in the co-trade indexDoes not fit15.8%
T16Options and leverageNo option trades were reported.Does not fit

Question
Does the member use options, and do option trades point the right way?

Insider signature
Informed traders favour options because leverage raises the payoff to private information.

Analyst note
No option trades were reported.

Evidence
Descriptive
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
All computed statistics (2)
option_trades0
option_share0
T5Direction before market-wide shocksNo market-wide shocks or documented events fell within five trading days after the member's trades.Not assessed

Question
Before the market's biggest moves, did the member's trades point the right way?

Insider signature
An informed trader's trades just before a market-moving event point in the direction of the coming move.

Analyst note
No market-wide shocks or documented events fell within five trading days after the member's trades.

Evidence
Descriptive
Margin δ
10 points above a coin flip
All computed statistics (1)
n_episodes0
T6Control and independenceTrading arrangement: not documented; trading during absence ran at 0.00 times the normal rate.Not assessed

Question
Does the member direct the trades, and does trading change when the member's access to information changes?

Insider signature
The person holding the information directs the trade.

Analyst note
Trading arrangement: not documented; trading during absence ran at 0.00 times the normal rate.

Evidence
Statistical
Absence rate ratio
0.00 [0.00, 5.44] 90%
0Estimate
This member0.00
All computed statistics (6)
rate_ratio0
rate_ratio_ci[0, 5.4436]
rate_ratio_batchdays0
rate_ratio_batchdays_ci[0, 54.6471]
absence_days48
trades_in_absence0
T9Policy-topic overlap2 priced trades fell in affected industries in the 30 days before the member's committee events and 15 did not; at least 10 of each are needed to compare them.Not assessed

Question
Did trades in stocks affected by the member's legislative work come before votes and move the right way?

Insider signature
Trading on knowledge of legislation before it is public.

Analyst note
2 priced trades fell in affected industries in the 30 days before the member's committee events and 15 did not; at least 10 of each are needed to compare them.

Evidence
Descriptive
Margin δ
0.5% per trade
All computed statistics (3)
n2
n_other15
events2150
T10Behavior after scrutinyNo documented scrutiny date; the estimated change point in trading activity is shown for reference.Not assessed

Question
Did trading change after press scrutiny or an ethics inquiry?

Insider signature
A member who trades on information has an incentive to keep control of trading after scrutiny.

Analyst note
No documented scrutiny date; the estimated change point in trading activity is shown for reference. Estimated change point 2020-06-30 (permutation p = 0.004).

Evidence
Descriptive
All computed statistics (5)
changepoint2020-06-30
changepoint_LR13.1240
changepoint_p0.0040
tradeday_rate_before0.0870
tradeday_rate_after6.43e-4
T12Anticipation of large stock moves3 trades were followed within two weeks by a large company-specific move; 1 were on the profitable side.Inconclusive (too few trades)

Question
When a traded stock made a large unexpected move soon after the trade, was the trade on the right side?

Insider signature
Buying shortly before a large jump or selling shortly before a large drop.

Analyst note
Hit rate 0.33, Clopper-Pearson [0.02, 0.86], exact one-sided p = 0.875; threshold |AR| > 3 sigma.

Evidence
Statistical
Hit rate
33.3% [1.7%, 86.5%] 90%
p-value
0.875
Holm-adjusted p
1.000
BH q-value
1.000
Margin δ
10 points above a coin flip
0δEstimate
This member33.3%
All computed statistics (6)
n3
hits1
hit_rate0.3333
ci[0.0170, 0.8647]
priced17
share_followed0.1765
T15Short-swing round trips4 buy-and-sell round trips within six months; in the month after opening, those positions moved -0.63% in the trade's favour relative to the market.Inconclusive (too few trades)

Question
Does the member buy and sell the same stock within six months, and do those round trips beat the market?

Insider signature
Short-horizon round trips capture a temporary informational edge.

Analyst note
Opening-trade signed CAR(1,21) -0.0063 [-0.1041, 0.0915], t_KP = -0.16, over 4 priced openings. Realized market-adjusted return to the closing trade averaged -0.27% (win rate 50%); it is shown for context only because exit timing is chosen after the fact.

Evidence
Statistical
Opening-trade signed 21-day CAR
−0.63% [−10.41%, +9.15%] 90%
p-value
0.557
Holm-adjusted p
1.000
BH q-value
0.999
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
0δEstimate
This member−0.63%
All computed statistics (9)
round_trips4
share_in_round_trips0.4211
priced4
realized_mean-0.0027
realized_win_rate0.5000
opening_car-0.0063
ci[-0.1041, 0.0915]
p0.5573
openings_priced4
Disclosed trades per monthPurchasesSales
2020202120222023202420252026

Largest positions traded

CompanyTradesDisclosed value
SPCX SpaceX1$50K to $100K
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc.2$2,002 to $30K
JNJ Johnson & Johnson2$2,002 to $30K
CRM Salesforce.com Inc2$2,002 to $30K
WMT Walmart Inc.2$2,002 to $30K
SBUX Starbucks Corporation1$1,001 to $15K
ABBV AbbVie Inc.1$1,001 to $15K
AAPL Apple Inc.1$1,001 to $15K

All disclosed trades

Amounts are the ranges reported on the filing. Late filings are those made more than 45 days after the trade.

JSON · CSV
19 trades
Trade dateAssetTypeAmountOwnerFiled after5-day CAR
Jun 15, 2026SPCX SpaceXPurchase$50K to $100Kself34 d–Filing
Jun 29, 2020ABBV AbbVie Inc.Sale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d+0.0%Filing
Jun 29, 2020AMZN Amazon.com, Inc.Sale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d−9.0%Filing
Jun 29, 2020AAPL Apple Inc.Sale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d+1.5%Filing
Jun 29, 2020BAC Bank of America CorporationCommitteeSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d+5.5%Filing
Jun 29, 2020CVX Chevron CorporationSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d+5.2%Filing
Jun 29, 2020FB Facebook, Inc. - Class ASale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d–Filing
Jun 29, 2020GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc.Sale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d−0.5%Filing
Jun 29, 2020JNJ Johnson & JohnsonSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d−0.3%Filing
Jun 29, 2020MSFT Microsoft CorporationSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d−0.6%Filing
Jun 29, 2020NKE Nike, Inc.Sale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d+1.9%Filing
Jun 29, 2020CRM Salesforce.com IncSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d−3.4%Filing
Jun 29, 2020SFST Southern First Bancshares, Inc.CommitteeSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d+13.4%Filing
Jun 29, 2020WMT Walmart Inc.Sale$1,001 to $15Kspouse39 d−4.5%Filing
May 28, 2020AMZN Amazon.com, Inc.Purchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse71 d+0.1%Filing
May 28, 2020JNJ Johnson & JohnsonPurchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse71 d−2.4%Filing
May 28, 2020CRM Salesforce.com IncPurchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse71 d−8.2%Filing
May 28, 2020SBUX Starbucks CorporationSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse71 d+2.8%Filing
May 28, 2020WMT Walmart Inc.Purchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse71 d−3.5%Filing