Committee overlap
Does the member trade industries their committees oversee, and do those trades do better?
What would look suspicious
Members may trade on information about industries their committees oversee.
Statistic
Jurisdiction excess share versus S&P 500 and congressional peers; in-minus-out of jurisdiction signed CAR
Inference
Identified set and bootstrap for the share; regression with sector and month fixed effects, date-clustered errors
Decision rule
Fits if the in-jurisdiction return premium is significantly positive after adjustment. Does not fit if there is no jurisdiction tilt and the premium is bounded below the margin. Otherwise open question.
Equivalence margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days (fixed before seeing the data)
Inputs
Limitations
Committee assignments are current only; the jurisdiction map is at GICS sector or sub-industry level.
Full derivation and algorithm: technical methodology (PDF), section T8.
Results across members
0 fits · 18 open question · 116 do not fit · 112 not assessed
Highest estimates
Members flagged by this test
| Member | Reading | Estimate | Holm p | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald S. Beyer, Jr. Rep. · D-VA-8 | Open question | 5.8% | – | 20% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 14% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Debbie Dingell Rep. · D-MI-6 | Open question | 12.6% | – | 41% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 28% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Byron Donalds Rep. · R-FL-19 | Open question | 17.6% | – | 41% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 23% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Pat Fallon Rep. · R-TX-4 | Open question | 18.4% | – | 26% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 7% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Josh Gottheimer Rep. · D-NJ-5 | Open question | 66.1% | – | 96% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 30% for a comparable benchmark. |
| John W. Hickenlooper Sen. · D-CO | Open question | 22.4% | – | 61% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 38% for a comparable benchmark. |
| David P. Joyce Rep. · R-OH-14 | Open question | 10.1% | – | 18% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 8% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Thomas H. Kean, Jr. Rep. · R-NJ-7 | Open question | 9.9% | – | 47% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 37% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Carol D. Miller Rep. · R-WV-1 | Open question | 16.8% | – | 31% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 14% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Jared Moskowitz Rep. · D-FL-23 | Open question | 4.8% | – | 21% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 16% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Dan Newhouse Rep. · R-WA-4 | Open question | 6.2% | – | 18% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 12% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Scott H. Peters Rep. · D-CA-50 | Open question | 6.7% | – | 34% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 28% for a comparable benchmark. |
| August Pfluger Rep. · R-TX-11 | Open question | 37.4% | – | 72% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 35% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Michael A. Rulli Rep. · R-OH-6 | Open question | 35.8% | – | 64% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 28% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Robert C. "Bobby" Scott Rep. · D-VA-3 | Open question | 38.2% | – | 39% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 0% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Tina Smith Sen. · D-MN | Open question | 47.3% | – | 87% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 40% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Greg Stanton Rep. · D-AZ-4 | Open question | 3.8% | – | 21% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 17% for a comparable benchmark. |
| Thomas R. Suozzi Rep. · D-NY-3 | Open question | 7.6% | – | 30% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 22% for a comparable benchmark. |