An independent review of public financial disclosures. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate, or any government agency.
U.S. House of Representatives

Rep. Linda T. Sánchez

Democrat · Representative, CA-38

Ways and Means
Results across 16 tests
Fits patternOpen questionDoes not fitNot assessedScreening signal

No test fits; open questions on breadth and concentration, disclosure timeliness.

Trades disclosed
19
Apr 21, 2015 to Oct 28, 2025
Companies traded
15
Disclosed value
$18K–$270K
Sum of reported ranges
Filed after 45 days
3
Median filing lag 36 days

Scorecard

Select a test to see the estimate, interval, adjusted p-values and robustness checks.

T2Breadth and concentration10 different companies; the effective number of equally sized positions is 9 and trading spans 72% of maximum sector diversity.Open question

Question
Is trading concentrated in a few companies rather than spread across a diversified portfolio?

Insider signature
Informed trading concentrates in the few issuers tied to the information.

Analyst note
Dollar HHI 0.112 (identified set [0.100, 0.520]); trade-count HHI 0.112 vs. 95th percentile 0.082 of 14 random draws from all congressional trades (p = 0.004). Normalized sector entropy 0.72 [0.73, 0.74]. Top three issuers (F, DIS, UBS) carry at least 5% of dollar volume.

Evidence
Statistical
Effective number of issuers
9 [2, 10] 90%
0Estimate
This member9
All computed statistics (13)
n14
issuers10
hhi_mid0.1122
hhi_bounds[0.1000, 0.5201]
n_eff8.9091
hhi_count0.1122
peer_benchmark_p950.0816
peer_benchmark_p0.0040
sector_entropy0.7248
sector_entropy_ci[0.7300, 0.7388]
top3_share_lower0.0477
top3[F, DIS, UBS]
top3_tied_to_eventstrue
T7Disclosure timeliness3 of 19 trades (15.8%) were disclosed late; median lag 36 days. Another 6 were over 45 days from the trade but filed within 30 days of the stated notification date.Open question

Question
Were trades disclosed within the STOCK Act's 45-day limit?

Insider signature
Delayed disclosure can conceal well-timed trades.

Analyst note
Late share 0.158, Wilson [0.065, 0.336]; 90th percentile lag 569 days; longest 569 days.

Evidence
Descriptive
Late share
15.8% [6.5%, 33.6%] 90%
Robust to variants
Yes
0Estimate
This member15.8%
All computed statistics (15)
n19
amendment_rows_excluded0
late3
late_from_trade9
excused_by_notification6
late_share0.1579
late_ci[0.0649, 0.3362]
median_lag36
p90_lag569
max_lag569
filings8
late_filings1
late_priced3
timely_priced9
late_priced_dates1
Robustness variantReadingEstimate
Late from the trade date alone, ignoring notification datesOpen question47.4%
T1Trade size100% of 14 trades were in the lowest disclosure band ($1,001-$15,000); trades just before large company-specific moves were not larger than usual.Does not fit

Question
Are the member's trades unusually large, especially just before news?

Insider signature
Informed trades are large relative to the trader's normal activity, because the profit from an informational edge scales with position size.

Analyst note
Lowest-band share 1.000, 90% Wilson [0.838, 1.000]. Event-linked size gap Delta_z = 0.00 (within-issuer permutation p = 1.000); 0 event-linked trades with z > 3 in bands of $50,001 or more.

Evidence
Statistical
Lowest-band share
100.0% [83.8%, 100.0%] 90%
p-value
1.000
Holm-adjusted p
1.000
BH q-value
1.000
0Estimate
This member100.0%
All computed statistics (9)
n14
lowest_band_share1
lowest_band_ci[0.8380, 1]
share_over_50k0
max_z0
size_gap0
size_gap_p1
event_linked2
event_linked_outliers0
T3Cadence and event proximity43% of trading days were batches of three or more companies; 21% of trades look routine; 14.3% of trades came within five trading days before a large company-specific move (chance alone: 6.8%).Does not fit

Question
Do trades arrive in routine rebalancing batches, or sporadically just before company news?

Insider signature
Opportunistic trades carry information and routine trades do not.

Analyst note
Batch-day share 3/7, Wilson [0.19, 0.71]; index of dispersion 2.71 (chi-square p = 0); routine share 0.21 (portfolio-routine or Cohen-Malloy-Pomorski two-year rule). Proximity share 0.143 vs. circular-shift null mean 0.068, p = 0.256.

Evidence
Statistical
Batch-day share
42.9% [18.6%, 71.1%] 90%
p-value
0.256
Holm-adjusted p
1.000
BH q-value
0.678
0Estimate
This member42.9%
All computed statistics (14)
n14
trade_days7
batch_share_trades0.7143
batch_day_share0.4286
batch_day_ci[0.1864, 0.7105]
dispersion_index2.7102
dispersion_p0
routine_share0.2143
proximity_share0.1429
proximity_null_mean0.0680
proximity_null_p950.2143
proximity_p0.2560
proximity_nonroutine0.0909
proximity_routine0.3333
T8Committee overlap15% of the member's mapped trading by dollar value was in industries their committees oversee, against 14% for a comparable benchmark.Does not fit

Question
Does the member trade industries their committees oversee, and do those trades do better?

Insider signature
Members may trade on information about industries their committees oversee.

Analyst note
Committees HSWM; jurisdiction sectors Distillers & Vintners, Health Care, Life & Health Insurance, Tobacco. Dollar share 0.154 (identified set [0.012, 0.732], bootstrap 0.016-0.395); benchmarks S&P 500 0.139, congressional peers 0.119.

Evidence
Descriptive
Jurisdiction excess share
1.5% [-12.2%, 25.7%] 90%
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
0δEstimate
This member1.5%
All computed statistics (11)
n13
in_jurisdiction_trades2
share0.1538
share_bounds[0.0120, 0.7315]
share_ci[0.0163, 0.3951]
benchmark_sp5000.1386
benchmark_peers0.1194
excess0.0152
excess_ci[-0.1223, 0.2565]
committees[HSWM]
jurisdiction_sectors[Distillers & Vintners, Health Care, Life & Health Insurance, Tobacco]
T11Performance relative to CongressAfter adjusting for noise, the member's trades rank at the 15% percentile of 134 members (shrunk estimate -0.28% per trade over a month).Does not fit

Question
After accounting for noise, does the member's trading beat that of other members?

Insider signature
A member with an information edge stands out from the cross-section of congressional traders.

Analyst note
Empirical Bayes: raw -0.0189, posterior -0.0028 (sd 0.0015); Congress mean -0.0028, between-member variance 0.000000.

Evidence
Statistical
Shrunk signed 21-day CAR
−0.28% [−0.53%, −0.03%] 90%
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
0δEstimate
This member−0.28%
All computed statistics (8)
raw-0.0189
posterior_mean-0.0028
posterior_sd0.0015
congress_mean-0.0028
tau20
percentile0.1493
members_compared134
lower95-0.0058
T13Co-trading with other members21% of trades had another member trading the same stock the same way within a week (chance alone: 17%).Does not fit

Question
Does the member trade the same stock in the same direction as other members at the same time more than chance predicts?

Insider signature
Shared nonpublic information spreads through networks and shows up as clustered trades.

Analyst note
Co-traded share 0.214; circular-shift null mean 0.169, 95th pct 0.357, p = 0.410. Co-traded signed CAR 0.0419, p = 0.060.

Evidence
Statistical
Co-traded share
21.4%
p-value
0.060
Holm-adjusted p
0.358
BH q-value
0.902
Robust to variants
Yes
All computed statistics (10)
n14
cotraded_share0.2143
null_mean0.1688
null_p950.3571
excess_p0.4100
cotraded_share_wo_top0.2143
excess_p_wo_top0.3300
cotraded_car0.0419
cotraded_car_ci[0.0136, 0.0701]
cotraded_car_p0.0597
Robustness variantReadingEstimate
Without M001157, the member with the most trades, in the co-trade indexDoes not fit21.4%
T15Short-swing round tripsNo purchase and sale of the same stock within six months.Does not fit

Question
Does the member buy and sell the same stock within six months, and do those round trips beat the market?

Insider signature
Short-horizon round trips capture a temporary informational edge.

Analyst note
No purchase and sale of the same stock within six months.

Evidence
Descriptive
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
All computed statistics (2)
round_trips0
share_in_round_trips0
T16Options and leverageNo option trades were reported.Does not fit

Question
Does the member use options, and do option trades point the right way?

Insider signature
Informed traders favour options because leverage raises the payoff to private information.

Analyst note
No option trades were reported.

Evidence
Descriptive
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
All computed statistics (2)
option_trades0
option_share0
T4Event timing (abnormal returns)Across 12 priced trades, purchases and sales moved 1.89% against the trade's direction relative to the market over the next month on average.Inconclusive (too few trades)

Question
Do purchases rise and sales fall more than the market in the weeks after the trade?

Insider signature
Purchases before price rises and sales before price falls.

Analyst note
Mean signed CAR(1,21) = -0.0189; 90% KP interval [-0.0664, 0.0287]; t_BMP = -0.80, r-bar = 0.044, t_KP = -0.64, Patell Z = -1.16, Corrado Z = -0.73. Dollar-weighted identified set [-0.1169, 0.0348]. Calendar-time alpha -22.46%/yr (NW t = -0.75, 126 days).

Evidence
Statistical
Mean signed 21-day CAR
−1.89% [−6.64%, +2.87%] 90%
p-value
0.773
Holm-adjusted p
1.000
BH q-value
0.983
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
Robust to variants
No, reading changes under some variants
0δEstimate
This member−1.89%
All computed statistics (16)
n12
theta-0.0189
ci[-0.0664, 0.0287]
p0.7329
t_kp-0.6418
rbar0.0437
se_cs0.0213
se_kp0.0265
t_cs-0.8875
t_bmp-0.7988
patell_z-1.1581
corrado_z-0.7251
dollar_weighted_bounds[-0.1169, 0.0348]
calendar_time[object Object]
calendar_alpha_ci[-0.0030, 0.0013]
by_horizon[object Object]
Robustness variantReadingEstimate
Horizon 5 daysOpen question−0.66%
Horizon 63 daysOpen question+0.12%
Excluding largest batch dateNot assessed+0.52%
Self-owned accounts onlyNot assessed–
Dollar-weighted (bounds)Open question+3.48%
Calendar-time alpha (annualized)−22.46%
T5Direction before market-wide shocksNo market-wide shocks or documented events fell within five trading days after the member's trades.Not assessed

Question
Before the market's biggest moves, did the member's trades point the right way?

Insider signature
An informed trader's trades just before a market-moving event point in the direction of the coming move.

Analyst note
No market-wide shocks or documented events fell within five trading days after the member's trades.

Evidence
Descriptive
Margin δ
10 points above a coin flip
All computed statistics (1)
n_episodes0
T6Control and independenceTrading arrangement: not documented; trading during absence ran at 0.00 times the normal rate.Not assessed

Question
Does the member direct the trades, and does trading change when the member's access to information changes?

Insider signature
The person holding the information directs the trade.

Analyst note
Trading arrangement: not documented; trading during absence ran at 0.00 times the normal rate.

Evidence
Statistical
Absence rate ratio
0.00 [0.00, 72.56] 90%
0Estimate
This member0.00
All computed statistics (6)
rate_ratio0
rate_ratio_ci[0, 72.5606]
rate_ratio_batchdays0
rate_ratio_batchdays_ci[0, 162.4341]
absence_days9
trades_in_absence0
T9Policy-topic overlap1 priced trades fell in affected industries in the 30 days before the member's committee events and 11 did not; at least 10 of each are needed to compare them.Not assessed

Question
Did trades in stocks affected by the member's legislative work come before votes and move the right way?

Insider signature
Trading on knowledge of legislation before it is public.

Analyst note
1 priced trades fell in affected industries in the 30 days before the member's committee events and 11 did not; at least 10 of each are needed to compare them.

Evidence
Descriptive
Margin δ
0.5% per trade
All computed statistics (3)
n1
n_other11
events1493
T10Behavior after scrutinyNo documented scrutiny date; the estimated change point in trading activity is shown for reference.Not assessed

Question
Did trading change after press scrutiny or an ethics inquiry?

Insider signature
A member who trades on information has an incentive to keep control of trading after scrutiny.

Analyst note
No documented scrutiny date; the estimated change point in trading activity is shown for reference. Estimated change point 2017-08-07 (permutation p = 0.006).

Evidence
Descriptive
All computed statistics (5)
changepoint2017-08-07
changepoint_LR13.0222
changepoint_p0.0060
tradeday_rate_before0.0100
tradeday_rate_after4.66e-4
T12Anticipation of large stock moves3 trades were followed within two weeks by a large company-specific move; 1 were on the profitable side.Inconclusive (too few trades)

Question
When a traded stock made a large unexpected move soon after the trade, was the trade on the right side?

Insider signature
Buying shortly before a large jump or selling shortly before a large drop.

Analyst note
Hit rate 0.33, Clopper-Pearson [0.02, 0.86], exact one-sided p = 0.875; threshold |AR| > 3 sigma.

Evidence
Statistical
Hit rate
33.3% [1.7%, 86.5%] 90%
p-value
0.875
Holm-adjusted p
1.000
BH q-value
1.000
Margin δ
10 points above a coin flip
0δEstimate
This member33.3%
All computed statistics (6)
n3
hits1
hit_rate0.3333
ci[0.0170, 0.8647]
priced12
share_followed0.2500
T14Family-account trades100% of trades were in family accounts; those moved -1.89% in the trade's favour over a month.Inconclusive (too few trades)

Question
Do trades in a spouse's or dependent's name do better than the member's own?

Insider signature
Routing informed trades through family accounts.

Analyst note
Family signed CAR -0.0189 [-0.0664, 0.0287], t_KP = -0.64.

Evidence
Statistical
Family-account signed CAR
−1.89% [−6.64%, +2.87%] 90%
p-value
0.733
Holm-adjusted p
1.000
BH q-value
0.928
Margin δ
0.5% per trade over 21 days
0δEstimate
This member−1.89%
All computed statistics (8)
family_trades14
family_share1
owner_unknown0
family_car-0.0189
family_ci[-0.0664, 0.0287]
diff–
diff_ci[–, –]
diff_p–
Disclosed trades per monthPurchasesSales
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025

Largest positions traded

CompanyTradesDisclosed value
F Ford Motor Company2$2,002 to $30K
UBS UbS Group Ag Registered Ordinary Shares2$2,002 to $30K
PFE Pfizer, Inc.2$2,002 to $30K
DIS Walt Disney Company2$2,002 to $30K
STOCK root9B Techologies Inc. (RTNB)1$1,001 to $15K
BAC Bank of America Corporation1$1,001 to $15K
SE Spectra Energy Corp1$1,001 to $15K
INTC Intel Corporation1$1,001 to $15K

All disclosed trades

Amounts are the ranges reported on the filing. Late filings are those made more than 45 days after the trade.

JSON · CSV
19 trades
Trade dateAssetTypeAmountOwnerFiled after5-day CAR
Oct 28, 2025CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. - Common StockSale$1,001 to $15Kdependent73 d−1.0%Filing
Feb 22, 2019 Charles Schwab - Bank of AmericaSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse569 d–Filing
Feb 22, 2019 Charles Schwab - EnbridgeSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse569 d–Filing
Feb 22, 2019 Charles Schwab - Ford Motor CoSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse569 d–Filing
Feb 22, 2019 Charles Schwab - Root 9 B Technologies IncSale$25 to $25spouse569 d–Filing
Feb 22, 2019 Charles Schwab - UBS Group AgSale$1,001 to $15Kspouse569 d–Filing
Aug 4, 2017MSFT Microsoft CorporationSale$1,001 to $15Kdependent119 d−1.0%Filing
Aug 4, 2017PFE Pfizer, Inc.CommitteeSale$1,001 to $15Kdependent119 d−0.3%Filing
Aug 4, 2017DIS Walt Disney CompanySale$1,001 to $15Kdependent119 d+4.6%Filing
May 17, 2017F Ford Motor CompanyPurchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse21 d−0.3%Filing
Aug 9, 2016INTC Intel CorporationSale$1,001 to $15Kdependent36 d−0.7%Filing
Aug 9, 2016PFE Pfizer, Inc.CommitteeSale$1,001 to $15Kdependent36 d+0.8%Filing
Aug 9, 2016DIS Walt Disney CompanySale$1,001 to $15Kdependent36 d−0.5%Filing
Jul 5, 2016UBS UbS Group Ag Registered Ordinary SharesPurchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse30 d+1.1%Filing
Jan 19, 2016BAC Bank of America CorporationPurchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse30 d−8.2%Filing
Jan 19, 2016F Ford Motor CompanyPurchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse30 d+1.5%Filing
Jan 19, 2016SE Spectra Energy CorpPurchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse30 d–Filing
Jan 19, 2016UBS UbS Group Ag Registered Ordinary SharesPurchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse30 d−4.0%Filing
Apr 21, 2015STOCK root9B Techologies Inc. (RTNB)Purchase$1,001 to $15Kspouse26 d–Filing